THE ADVENTURES OF TINTIN

reviewed by Matthew Schuchman | Tuesday, December 20th, 2011

TintinParamount Pictures/Columbia Pictures
107 min., dir. by Steven Spielberg, with Jamie Bell, Daniel Craig, Andy Serkis,

Even if you don’t appreciate any of the partnering names, The Adventures if Tintin may be the greatest collaboration of filmmakers to ever work on a non-anthology feature length film. The film is directed by Steven Spielberg and produced by Peter Jackson (who will reverse rolls for the sequel), with a script by Steven Moffat (BBC’s “Sherlock,” “Doctor Who,” and “Coupling”), Edgar Wright (Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz, Scott Pilgrim vs. the World), Joe Cornish (Attack the Block), and stars the voices of Jamie Bell, Daniel Craig, Nick Frost, Simon Pegg, and Andy Serkis. With all that talent, I thought the end result would have been much more spectacular.

Ace investigative reporter Tintin and his dog Snowy are out and about at a local market when Tintin comes across a model boat that he must have. Seconds after making his purchase, numerous shady characters offer up a hefty sum for the model. Refusing to sell, Tintin takes the boat home, where things just get weirder. The ship breaks, his home is broken into and the ship is stolen, a man gets shot to death on his front step — Tintin has stepped into something he doesn’t understand. However, this series of events sets in motion Tintin’s next investigative adventure and ultimately teams him up with his polar opposite, Captain Haddock.

Whether it was a geeky love letter from the fanboy writers or a redo by the film’s director, The Adventures of Tintin comes off as an apology for Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. Replace Tintin with Indy and add Nazis and snakes, and the two franchises would be identical. Disappointed fans of the Indian Jones films will take Tintin to heart and be thrilled by the resurrection of the good-spirited Spielberg action film style. While I’m not saying I dislike Indiana Jones films, the obvious overwrought comparison left a bitter taste in my mouth. With tons of elaborate actions scenes, gunfire, and booze, the film seems to shout, “Look what I can do,” but fails to fully keep my attention. Tintin is still entertaining, but for a technically gorgeous film from an unprecedented meeting of minds, Tintin is simply more of the same.

The indisputable triumph of The Adventures of Tintin is the animation. Weta digital has taken its talents to a new height and have created a group of the most realistic motion-captured human beings. Detailed wrinkles and movements are complemented to the highest extent with amazing mouth movement. However, this begs the question to be asked: with a film where embellished noses and ears are the only distinguishable differences from real life, is it necessary to create a fully animated feature?

The voice acting also is a high point for the film, specifically that of Daniel Craig and Nick Frost. Craig’s voice as the film’s villain was completely unrecognizable to the point I started to doubt it was really him, while I was only to distinguish Frost’s voice by identifying that of Simon Pegg’s who plays the other half of the bumbling twin detectives, the Thompsons. The entire cast did a fantastic job of not taking the characters into the world of the absurd and it only strengthened the film.

Suffice it to say, I was let down by The Adventures of Tintin. This doesn’t mean it’s not entertaining or a bad film. I still am unsure how parents will react to children seeing the film, as it is full of alcoholism and gunfire, though it’s nothing we haven’t seen in any of the Indy films. Maybe I went into the theater with expectations so high, they could only be knocked down. Either way, hot off the heels of Scorsese’s 3D trumph Hugo, The Adventures of Tintin is an ant hill sitting next to a mountain.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!